← Back to Docs

Regime Classification

How the composite score maps to five distinct market regimes.

Overview

After computing the four pillar scores and combining them into a final score (−10 to +10), that score is classified into one of five regimes. Each regime has a defined score range and a distinct set of market characteristics.

Regime thresholds (0-100 internal scale / −10 to +10 displayed)
≥ 70 (≥ +4.0) → RISK-ON
≥ 58 (≥ +1.6) → CAUTIOUS-BULL
≥ 42 (≥ −1.6) → NEUTRAL
≥ 30 (≥ −4.0) → CAUTIOUS-BEAR
< 30 (< −4.0) → RISK-OFF
Hysteresis: A 0.5-point dead-band prevents regime flipping at boundaries. The score must cross a boundary by at least 0.5 to trigger a change. This eliminates whipsaw during choppy markets.

The Five Regimes

RISK-ON

Score ≥ 70 (≥ +4.0)
Characteristics
  • · Strong market sentiment (Fear & Greed 61–90)
  • · Significant ETF inflows and/or rising stablecoin supply
  • · Healthy funding rates: not overleveraged
  • · Low liquidation activity, calm derivatives markets
What the signals show

All four pillars scoring positively. Liquidity is flowing in, derivatives are not overextended, and sentiment is elevated.

Historical example

January 2024 ETF launch period: all four pillars scored strongly positive. ETF inflows were at record levels, sentiment was elevated (not extreme), funding rates were healthy, and liquidation activity was low.

CAUTIOUS-BULL

Score 58 to 69 (+1.6 to +3.9)
Characteristics
  • · Bullish price sentiment but some divergences appearing
  • · Liquidity flows positive but slowing or mixed
  • · Funding rates elevated: longs accumulating leverage
  • · Moderate liquidation spikes possible
What the signals show

Net bullish conditions, but at least one pillar showing stress or softening. Not all components are aligned.

Historical example

March 2024 near $73k ATH: sentiment was extreme (91+), ETF flows were slowing, and funding rate was very elevated. Multiple pillars showed stress while price remained elevated.

NEUTRAL

Score 42 to 57 (−1.6 to +1.5)
Characteristics
  • · Mixed or indeterminate signals across pillars
  • · ETF flows flat, stablecoin supply stable
  • · Funding rates near zero: balanced positioning
  • · No clear directional bias in derivatives
What the signals show

Pillars are split or all near zero. No sustained trend in either direction. The system sees insufficient signal to lean bullish or bearish.

Historical example

Summer 2023: Pillars showed mixed readings for several months. ETF flows were flat (pre-launch), stablecoin supply was stable, and funding rates were near zero. No pillar showed a sustained directional signal.

CAUTIOUS-BEAR

Score 30 to 41 (−4.0 to −1.7)
Characteristics
  • · Bearish sentiment: Fear & Greed declining
  • · ETF outflows or stablecoin contraction
  • · Rising liquidation cascade ratios
  • · Funding rates negative: shorts building
What the signals show

Net bearish conditions, with outflows and derivative stress visible. Not yet at extreme levels.

Historical example

May 2022 LUNA collapse: liquidation cascade ratios spiked to extreme levels, sentiment dropped sharply into the Fear zone, and ETF proxy flows (pre-launch era: exchange flows) turned negative. Multiple pillars scored strongly negative.

RISK-OFF

Score < 30 (< −4.0)
Characteristics
  • · Extreme fear in sentiment index
  • · Sustained heavy ETF outflows
  • · Liquidation cascade ratios at extreme levels (&gt;3&times;)
  • · Large negative OI changes: capitulation deleveraging
What the signals show

All pillars signaling stress. Outflows dominant, derivatives showing capitulation, sentiment at extreme fear levels.

Historical example

November 2022 FTX collapse: liquidation volume was at extreme multiples of the 7-day average, exchange inflows were very large (indicating distribution), and sentiment reached 5 (extreme fear). All pillars scored at or near their most negative values.

Key principles

  • Regime classification describes the current state of the market, not a prediction of what comes next.
  • The Macro Context layer provides an independent overlay showing how macro conditions align with or diverge from the BTC regime.
  • Regime changes lag market turns slightly by design. The hysteresis mechanism prioritizes stability over sensitivity.

This is data and information only. Not financial advice.